Realistic Lifetime 5AR4

knowledge base for the classic Dynaco ST70

Realistic Lifetime 5AR4

Postby kt88pppamp » Tue Jun 28, 2011 9:39 pm

How much do you think one of those will fetch NOS?

I was bored and surfing the 1967 Radio Shack catalog and it cost $2.39 then, about $16.17, according to the CPI in today's money.

Also, do you think it would hold up in a stereo 70 like the Mullards? After all, they were "guaranteed for life."
User avatar
kt88pppamp
KT88
 
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:11 am
Location: Rochester, NY

Postby Ty_Bower » Wed Jun 29, 2011 4:19 am

It depends on who really made it. Somewhere around here I have a Realistic Lifetime 5AR4. It is silkscreened "GE" on the base, but etched "GT BRITAIN" with Mullard codes on the glass. Go figure.

Image
"It's a different experience; the noise occlusion, crisp, clear sound, and defined powerful bass. Strong bass does not corrupt the higher frequencies, giving a very different overall feel of the sound, one that is, in my opinion, quite unique."
User avatar
Ty_Bower
KT88
 
Posts: 1494
Joined: Wed Mar 21, 2007 2:50 pm
Location: Newark, DE

Postby EWBrown » Wed Jun 29, 2011 8:46 pm

Back in the 1950s and 1960s, the US Dollar was strong, and most European currency was relatively "weak", and the Mullards, Telefunkens and Amperex tubes were generally considered as being the "cheap imports" at the time.

These tubes were often supplied with kits at the time, as they cost less than their US counterparts. Little did they know....

FWIW, some of the Radio Shack "Lifetime" 12AX7s were Telefunkens, they have the little tell-tale "diamond" embossed on the base.

Radio Shack just chose replacement or equivalent tubes which cost them the least, and the same tube type may have more than one country of origin, from year to year.

/ed B
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
User avatar
EWBrown
Insulator & Iron Magnate
 
Posts: 6389
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 6:03 am
Location: Now located in Clay County, NC !

Postby kt88pppamp » Wed Jun 29, 2011 9:29 pm

The same catalog offered for sale the Realistic SAF-40D with a matched tuner that boasted:

70 watts of undistorted power, large output transformers give clear and resonate bass!

http://www.radioshackcatalogs.com/catalogs/1967/

go to page 32-33

After some research I found that amp uses 5 12AX7's and the output tubes use 7189's. I think those are like EL84s, a tube which I do not know much about. The OPTs seem a little beefy for what I have seen in similar amps but 35 watts seems a little much for UL mode. It would seem to me that they are running in pentode mode cathode biased.. You agree? If so, id imagine that would be distortion city.

http://www.radiomuseum.org/r/radio_shac ... saf40.html
User avatar
kt88pppamp
KT88
 
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:11 am
Location: Rochester, NY

Postby DeathRex » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:53 am

You can get about 17 watts out of a EL84. You should be able to get a little more out of a 7189, because of higher plate voltage, but the only way to get 70 watts is to include a 40 watt table lamp.
At first I wanted to be a ET. Now I are one.
User avatar
DeathRex
KT88
 
Posts: 1014
Joined: Wed Nov 18, 2009 8:13 pm
Location: Cortez, CO

Postby TomMcNally » Thu Jun 30, 2011 11:19 am

Back in 1967 they used the "Music Power" of amps, which was
double the real power. So "70 watts" was 35 watts per channel x 2.
Which is really 17 watts x 4 ... at least back then no one cheated,
they all used the same ratings.

Car stereo and computer speakers and other audio items are
still not forced to comply to that. That's why you see
computer speakers powered by a 300 ma wall wart claiming
to be "400 watts" ... car stereo amps are "1000 watts" haha
User avatar
TomMcNally
Darling du Jour
 
Posts: 2729
Joined: Sat Nov 19, 2005 2:19 pm
Location: Northfield, NJ

Postby kt88pppamp » Thu Jun 30, 2011 1:52 pm

If a car stereo were to supply 1000 watts, id think you would need a bigger battery or more than one, depending on the battery and alternator!
User avatar
kt88pppamp
KT88
 
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:11 am
Location: Rochester, NY

Postby kt88pppamp » Thu Jun 30, 2011 2:55 pm

Go to page 47. The Mullard EL-34MP went for $6.89 in 67'. That would be $46.61 in today's money. Today's pairs vary but are fairly comparably prices, maybe a little cheaper for most pairs.

How come the shack did not carry 6550's. Too expensive?
User avatar
kt88pppamp
KT88
 
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:11 am
Location: Rochester, NY

Postby burnedfingers » Thu Jun 30, 2011 5:29 pm

quote:
If a car stereo were to supply 1000 watts, id think you would need a bigger battery or more than one, depending on the battery and alternator!

Over 20yrs ago when working bench repair we tested an Alpine power amplifier that was the biggest out at the time. To make a long story short it didn't come close to its rated power with one battery, five batteries or 10 batteries with a 250Amp charger on boost. Its all hype and some believe in it.
burnedfingers
KT88
 
Posts: 640
Joined: Mon Sep 05, 2005 6:38 am

Postby dcgillespie » Thu Jun 30, 2011 7:31 pm

Radio Shack carried "receiving" tubes, but the 6550 has always been considered an industrial tube. Yes, it's in the RCA receiving tube manual, but just like the 7591, RCA was virtually shamed into listing these non-RCA tubes in their final printing of the manual, due to the tremendous popularity of them.

Dave
dcgillespie
KT88
 
Posts: 399
Joined: Sun Mar 08, 2009 5:34 am
Location: Ball Ground, GA

Postby soundmasterg » Thu Jun 30, 2011 10:18 pm

You can take that lifetime Radio Shack tube to a Rat Shack when it fails and get a new replacement (without the lifetime warranty). Its pretty funny actually, because when you go into the store, the guy at the desk doesn't even know what a vacuum tube is and will have to call a manager, or in my case, call the district office. Eventually they decide that yes there is a warranty that they have to honor, so then ended up sending me a JJ 6L6 to replace the bad Rat Shack 6L6 I had, and that I had picked up at a local surplus seller for $2! It was worth the time waiting for the people there to get a clue...haha.

Greg
soundmasterg
 
Posts: 76
Joined: Thu Feb 08, 2007 5:35 pm
Location: Oregon

Postby kevco » Fri Jul 01, 2011 6:26 am

I've seen anecdotal evidence that "The Shack" as they are now calling themselves (presumably because nobody knows what a radio is anymore) does, or did, maintain stock of vacuum tubes at a warehouse location in Texas. I've come across several stories of smartass tube guys wading thru zit faced store clerks up through management hierarchy to eventually be sent a NOS replacement on the grounds that the new tube does not carry the "Lifetime" warranty of it's predecessor and that no further replacements will be given.
User avatar
kevco
 
Posts: 69
Joined: Mon Jun 15, 2009 2:08 pm
Location: Aldan, Pennsylvania

Postby EWBrown » Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:00 am

Up to recently, RS used to have a "partnership" with AES, to supply the "Lifetime" tube replacements. Apparently this is no longer the case.

The "Shack" just barely sells comoponents parts anymore >:o >:o Just becoming yet another consumer (disposable) goods vendor.

They're just slowly pushing themselves to the edge of the cliff...

The Shack, becoming more like "The Shanty" :(

/ed B
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
User avatar
EWBrown
Insulator & Iron Magnate
 
Posts: 6389
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 6:03 am
Location: Now located in Clay County, NC !

Postby kt88pppamp » Fri Jul 01, 2011 8:53 am

EWBrown,

I am very disappointed with the shack as well :/

I remember when i was a child going into a shack and in the back of the store seeing all those nice component parts. It probably helped fuel my electronics interest, subconsciously perhaps. Now when I go into a shack just to buy a few diodes, the zit faced clerk asks me about my stupid cellphone >:o

There was an old timer manager in one of the local radio shacks in Evanston who actually had a working knowledge of electronics, perhaps an engineer or a serious hobbyist himself! When I was in high school, I frequented that place and remember him complaining about the direction Radio Shack was heading. Where are those guys now?
User avatar
kt88pppamp
KT88
 
Posts: 530
Joined: Tue Sep 26, 2006 12:11 am
Location: Rochester, NY

Postby Geek » Fri Jul 01, 2011 1:12 pm

EWBrown wrote:They're just slowly pushing themselves to the edge of the cliff...


Indeed!

They did this some years back in Canada, but it worked to our advantage.... they dumped all their parts stock on Liquidation World and we picked up the parts for a penny or two on the dollar :))

Cheers!
-= Gregg =-
Fine wine comes in glass bottles, not plastic sacks. Therefore the finer electrons are also found in glass bottles.
User avatar
Geek
KT88
 
Posts: 3585
Joined: Sun Oct 21, 2007 3:01 am
Location: Chilliwack, British Columbia

Next

Return to st70

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 30 guests