Vaporware? Heck no!

a DIY, modified Mullard 5-20 monoblock design

Vaporware? Heck no!

Postby Shannon Parks » Wed Nov 12, 2003 7:21 pm

We're still waiting for the 100 mpg carburetor, a mission to Mars, low fat food that tastes good and a $1 coin that doesn't look like a quarter.

But the Eiclone is here.



www.diytube.com/gallery/ike1.jpg
-Playing some Flying Burrito Bros, front shot, no chassis, KT88's running at 490VDC B+ and biased at 60mA

www.diytube.com/gallery/ike2.jpg
-The Rev Dash Eiclone for comparison

www.diytube.com/gallery/ike3.jpg
-Bottom view of the Eiclone

www.diytube.com/gallery/ike4.jpg
-Another view

Thanks for all the emails requests - not <much> longer. But as they say, if it hasn't been tested, it doesn't work. :thumbleft:

Shannon
User avatar
Shannon Parks
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3764
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 5:40 pm
Location: Poulsbo, Washington

Nice!!!!!

Postby EWBrown » Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:07 am

I like it, I want two :D

What's that in the box behind it in the fourth picture, doesn't quite look like a DIY 35 or an "ike".

/ed B in NH
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
User avatar
EWBrown
Insulator & Iron Magnate
 
Posts: 6389
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 6:03 am
Location: Now located in Clay County, NC !

I Like Ike

Postby Shannon Parks » Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:10 am

EWBrown wrote:I like it, I want two :D

What's that in the box behind it in the fourth picture, doesn't quite look like a DIY 35 or an "ike".

/ed B in NH


It is also in photo #2 -- the original Eiclone. I did a major re-layout.

Shannon
User avatar
Shannon Parks
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3764
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 5:40 pm
Location: Poulsbo, Washington

Nice!

Postby EWBrown » Thu Nov 13, 2003 9:22 am

I like the fat "coke bottle" tubes, they give it even more class. :D :wink:

I've been getting used to those skinny EL34s lately, between repairing the original ST-70, building the "Triode Special" stainless steel behemoth and most recently a 12AX7/EL34 2 channel SE. In that one, the first tube set of Sovtek 12AX7s and ElectroHarmonix EL34s sounded a bit harsh - but then those were guitar amp grade tubes, switched to Shuguang (Chinese) 12AX7s and Svetlana EL34s, sounded much nicer. Best was some old Telefunken 12AX7s and Amperex EL34s that I had on hand. Bought those way back when they were still cheap, and glad of it.

/ed B in NH
Real Radios Glow in the Dark
User avatar
EWBrown
Insulator & Iron Magnate
 
Posts: 6389
Joined: Wed Mar 19, 2003 6:03 am
Location: Now located in Clay County, NC !

Telefunkens

Postby gogzhad » Thu Nov 13, 2003 1:08 pm

Ed - you are right, the old telefunken 12AX7's are hard to beat - had some in my Marantz 7, rolled in Mullards, a few late model brands, but nothing (that I tried) could beat the Telefunkens for clear, clean sound. In my ST-70, the Mullard EL34's sounded the best, though the differences did not seem as pronounced.
So, as they say, Funkengruven, I guess
tu be or not tu be
gogzhad
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:57 pm

Great Pics, Coke Bottle, and Telefunkins

Postby Thermion » Thu Nov 13, 2003 7:01 pm

Hey Shannon, great pics. It is good to see a plan come together.

Ed, the coke bottles in the pictures are Sovtek KT88s. FWIW, these are very good tubes. I used a quad in my MKIIIs and put about 3000 hours on them. They still test like new on my Hickok. Nice shape too. When I build my Eiclones, I plan to use Mullard GZ37s as rectifiers. These are also gorgeous ST shaped glass. If I use the Sovteks instead of my JJ KT88s, it should look wonderful.

I recently purchased four Telefunkin 12AX7s on Ebay. I have tried them in my recently rebuilt ST70 and am very impressed by the results. Compared to any current production (Sovtek, EI, JJ) in this amp the Tele's are way out in the lead. They also compare well to my old stock stash of US 12AX7s. In fact, they are better than most of them. I also bought a Tele 12AU7 to use in my DIYtube Rev C amp currently under construction.

Unfortunately, I can't afford some Tele 6BQ5s to use in the amp.

JT
Thermion
 
Posts: 181
Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2003 6:04 pm
Location: Fisher, IL

Where did you end up with the ironware?

Postby gogzhad » Fri Nov 14, 2003 4:05 pm

Last mention I could find about outputs and power xfmr's was the hammond (700 VCT) and the 1650P outputs. Is that where you ended up?
thanks.
tu be or not tu be
gogzhad
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:57 pm

Re: Where did you end up with the ironware?

Postby Shannon Parks » Fri Nov 14, 2003 8:59 pm

gogzhad wrote:Last mention I could find about outputs and power xfmr's was the hammond (700 VCT) and the 1650P outputs. Is that where you ended up?
thanks.


We'll be doing several different configurations during testing (solid state and tube rectification for example). I can't make recommendations yet, except that I think I will lean towards the 1650N outputs to be a little more 6550/KT88 friendly.

Shannon
User avatar
Shannon Parks
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3764
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 5:40 pm
Location: Poulsbo, Washington

That works for me...

Postby gogzhad » Sat Nov 15, 2003 11:19 am

The 1650N has nominal impedance of 4300 Ohms - which is cool because it is the same as the Dynaco outputs used on the Mk III - also available in re-issue form from Ned at Triode - not as economical as the Hammonds, but if you've heard a Mk III, you know they're excellent...maybe there's a Mk III vs. Eiclone shootout in my future?
tu be or not tu be
gogzhad
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:57 pm

Re: That works for me...

Postby Shannon Parks » Sat Nov 15, 2003 12:18 pm

gogzhad wrote:The 1650N has nominal impedance of 4300 Ohms - which is cool because it is the same as the Dynaco outputs used on the Mk III - also available in re-issue form from Ned at Triode - not as economical as the Hammonds, but if you've heard a Mk III, you know they're excellent...maybe there's a Mk III vs. Eiclone shootout in my future?


Sure! Thermion is helping me test the Eiclones and his main amps are Mark IIIs.

I've been doing some interesting tests this morning. I just switched to the 1650N from the 1650P as the frequency response (with KT88s and their lower output resistance, mind you) with the 6.6K outputs was very midrange weighted. Though I imagine the results will change somewhat when I redo the test in the future with EL34s, I seem to recall that I have read remarks that the HF-87 had a sweet midrange. Hmmmm....

On a side note, these KT88s sure can dissipate the heat! I had to come in from the shop to double check their ratings.

Shannon
User avatar
Shannon Parks
Site Admin
 
Posts: 3764
Joined: Tue Mar 18, 2003 5:40 pm
Location: Poulsbo, Washington

Output Iron, etc

Postby gogzhad » Sat Nov 15, 2003 12:33 pm

I've got a pair of Mk III's, one with KT-88's, the other with 6550's. To be honest, I can't hear a difference between the two, but the KT88's do light up noticably more than the 6550's, and the top of the cage over the 88's is pretty warm...have to admit, I like the KT88's better, just because they have that cool coke-bottle shape...my 6550's are straight sided...not too scientific, I know, but hey, if this was about science, we'd all be gushing about how low the THD numbers were on our solid-state hardware...
tu be or not tu be
gogzhad
 
Posts: 54
Joined: Thu Mar 27, 2003 3:57 pm


Return to eiclone

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: No registered users and 8 guests